[1]柳 键,谢 军.考虑绿色投入水平与回收努力程度的再制造闭环供应链决策研究[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2023,(06):562-570.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2023.06.03]
　LIU Jian,XIE Jun.The Decision-Making of Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Green Process Input and Recycling Effort[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2023,(06):562-570.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2023.06.03]
点击复制

考虑绿色投入水平与回收努力程度的再制造闭环供应链决策研究()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年06期
页码:
562-570
栏目:
绿色供应链管理
出版日期:
2023-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Decision-Making of Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Green Process Input and Recycling Effort
文章编号:
1000-5862(2023)06-0562-09
作者:
柳 键1; 谢 军1; 2
(1.江西财经大学信息管理学院,江西 南昌 330013; 2.南昌工程学院工商管理学院,江西 南昌 330099)
Author(s):
LIU Jian1;  XIE Jun1; 2
(1.School of Information Technology,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economic,Nanchang Jiangxi 330013,China; 2.School of Business Administration,Nanchang Institute of Technology,Nanchang Jiangxi 330099,China)
关键词:
再制造闭环供应链;  绿色工艺投入;  回收努力;  定价决策
Keywords:
remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain;  green process input;  recycling effort;  pricing
分类号:
Q 948.5
DOI:
10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2023.06.03
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对单一生产商和单一销售商组成的2级再制造闭环供应链,考虑生产商的绿色投入水平和回收商的回收努力程度,分别在生产商回收和销售商回收2种模式下,构建生产商主导的Stackelberg动态博弈,分析在不同回收商角色下生产商和销售商的定价、绿色工艺投入和回收努力投入的最优决策方案及各自利润的变化.研究结果表明:1)生产商对绿色工艺的投入不受回收商角色的影响; 2)当生产商回收时,回收努力程度与生产全新产品与回收再制造产品的成本差呈正相关关系; 当销售商回收时,回收努力程度与回收单位产品获利呈正相关关系; 3)在销售商回收时生产商获利更多,这说明生产商会优先选择将回收工作委托给销售商.研究验证了改进绿色生产工艺和提高回收率是实现废旧产品循环利用的重要手段,这可以为生产商和销售商的价格制定、绿色工艺投入和回收努力投入的决策提供参考.
Abstract:
For a remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain composed of the manufacturer and the distributor, considering the green process input and recycling effort,the two-stage Stackelberg game models dominated by the manufacturer are established under the two modes of the manufacturer recycling and the distributor recycling, thus analyzing the optimal decision-making of pricing,green process inputs,recycling efforts, and the profits.The results show that no matter who takes on recycling,the manufacturer should make great effort to improve its greenness of products.When the manufacturer recycles,the level of recycling effort is positively related to the cost difference between the production of new products and the remanufactured products.When the distributor recycles, the level of recycling effort is positively related to the compensation of unit recycling product.The manufacturer can gain more profit when the seller recycles,indicating that the manufacturer may prefer to entrust the recycling work to the seller.The research proves that improving the green production process and the recycling rate are important means to realize the recycling of waste products,and can provide reference for the decision-making of producers and distributors for price decision,green process investment and recycling efforts.

参考文献/References:

[1] 季凯文,罗璐薏.绿色金融促进工业企业绿色转型的作用机理[J].金融教育研究,2022,35(2):35-43.
[2] SAVASKAN R C,BHATTACHARYA S,VAN WASSENHOVE L N.Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing[J].Management Science,2004,50(2):239-252.
[3] SAVASKAN R C,VAN WASSENHOVE L N.Reverse channel design:the case of competing retailers[J].Ma-nagement Science,2006,52(1):1-14.
[4] 黄祖庆,易荣华,达庆利.第三方负责回收的再制造闭环供应链决策结构的效率分析[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(3):73-77.
[5] RAY S,BOYACI T,ARAS N.Optimal prices and trade-in rebates for durable,remanufacturable products[J].Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,2005,7(3): 208-228.
[6] KETZENBERG M E,SOUZA G C,GUIDE V D R.Mixed assembly and disassembly operations for remanufacturing[J].Production and Operation Management,2003,12(3):320-335.
[7] 郭亚军,赵礼强,李绍.随机需求下闭环供应链协调的收入费用共享契约研究[J].运筹与管理,2007,16(6):15-20.
[8] 葛静燕,黄培清.价格相依的闭环供应链渠道选择和协调策略[J].工业工程与管理,2007, 12(1):29-34.
[9] 孙浩,达庆利.基于产品差异的再制造闭环供应链定价与协调研究[J].管理学报,2010, 7(5):733-738.
[10] 洪宪培,王宗军,赵丹.闭环供应链定价模型与回收渠道选择决策[J].管理学报,2012, 9(12):1848-1855.
[11] 曾剑锋,柳键.碳减排背景下闭环供应链生产与回收策略研究[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(5):536-544.
[12] 王文宾,范玲玲,杨斯奇,等.制造商分担回收投资成本对闭环供应链决策的影响[J].统计与决策,2018,34(18):57-61.
[13] 梁喜,魏晨光.不同CSR投入下闭环供应链回收与减排决策[J].计算机集成制造系统,2022,28(12):3993-4010.
[14] 闫彦超,马祖军.“线上销售/回收+线下服务”的闭环供应链定价与服务决策[J].中国管理科学,2022,30(1):175-184.
[15] 曹裕,李青松,胡韩莉.不同政府补贴策略对供应链绿色决策的影响研究[J].管理学报,2019,16(2):297-305,316.
[16] LI Bin,CHEN Weichun,XU Chuanchao,et al.Impacts of goverment subsidies for environmental-friendly in a dual-channel supply chain[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,171(2):1558-1576.
[17] 江世英,李随成.考虑产品绿色度的绿色供应链博弈模型[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(6):169-176.
[18] XU Xiaoping,HE Ping,XU Hao,et al.Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2017,183:433-442.
[19] 周艳菊,胡凤英,周正龙.零售商主导下促进绿色产品需求的联合研发契约协调研究[J].管理工程学报,2020,34(2):194-204.
[20] 曾剑锋,柳键.主导模式与风险厌恶对绿色供应链决策的影响研究[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,41(2):204-211.
[21] 游达明,朱桂菊.低碳供应链生态研发、合作促销与定价的微分博弈分析[J].控制与决策,2016,31(6):1047-1056.
[22] 关志民,曲优,赵莹.考虑决策者失望规避的供应链协同绿色创新动态优化与协调研究[J].运筹与管理,2020,29(5):96-107.
[23] 刘丽,韩同银,金浩.基于绿色技术创新和制造商竞争的绿色供应链微分博弈研究[J].管理学报,2023,20(1):116-126.
[24] LI Guo,TIAN Lin,ZHENG Hong.Information sharing in an online marketplace with co-opetitive sellers[J].Production and Operations Management,2021,30(10):3713-3734.
[25] 高举红,韩红帅,侯丽婷,等.考虑绿色工艺投入水平和销售努力的零售商主导型闭环供应链决策研究[J].管理评论,2015,27(4):187-196.
[26] 覃艳华,曹细玉,陈本松.努力弹性系数与成本同时扰动的闭环供应链协调应对研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(5):41-47.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-08-20
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(72162018)和江西省研究生创新专项资金(YC2020-B038,YC2022-B154)资助项目.
作者简介:柳 键(1964—),男,湖南浏阳人,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事物流与供应链管理研究.E-mail:liu-jian3816@263.net
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-11-25