[1]涂冬波,高旭亮,汪大勋,等.基于不同CDM视角的CD-CAT题库建设[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2018,(04):366-373.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2018.04.08]
 TU Dongbo,GAO Xuliang,WANG Daxun,et al.The Study on the CD-CAT Item Bank Based on the Perspective of Different CDMs[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2018,(04):366-373.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2018.04.08]
点击复制

基于不同CDM视角的CD-CAT题库建设()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
366-373
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Study on the CD-CAT Item Bank Based on the Perspective of Different CDMs
文章编号:
1000-5862(2018)04-0366-08
作者:
涂冬波高旭亮汪大勋蔡 艳
江西师范大学心理学院,江西 南昌 330022
Author(s):
TU DongboGAO XuliangWANG DaxunCAI Yan
College of Psychology,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang Jiangxi 330022,China
关键词:
CD-CAT 认知诊断模型 混合模型 题库
Keywords:
CD-CAT CDM Mixed CDMs item bank
分类号:
B 841.7
DOI:
10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2018.04.08
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在CD-CAT题库建设过程中,选择合适的认知诊断模型(CDM)标定题库参数是一个关键的步骤.若一个题库均采用一个CDM来标定题库所有参数,则可能会造成模型资料失拟.提出了一种基于混合模型的题库建设思路,通过Monte Carlo 模拟研究验证了基于混合模型建立题库的效果,并与传统的基于单一模型的题库建设进行了比较,为CD-CAT在选用合适的模型方面提供了理论借鉴.
Abstract:
The item bank is a very critical part of the cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing(CD-CAT).In regular CD-CAT,an item bank uses the same cognitive diagnostic model to calibrate the item parameters,however,all the items in item bank can’t be fully fitted with the same CDM.In the study the advantage of the method proposed by de la Torre to select an appropriate CDM for each item of item bank within a G-DINA framework has been taken,for convenience,this method is referred to as a Mixed CDMs,and use a complex simulation study to compare the performance of Mixed CDMs and five special models(G-DINA,DINA,DINO,A-CDM and RRUM)in CD-CAT.The results show that across all conditions,the Mixed CDMs provided the ideal classification accuracy and utilization rate of the item bank.

参考文献/References:

[1] 高旭亮,涂冬波.参数化认知诊断模型:心理计量性能特征、比较及其转换[J].江西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2017,50(1):88-104.
[2] de la Torre J.The generalized DINA model framework[J].Psychometrika,2011,76(2):179-199.
[3] von Davier M.A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data[J].British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,2008,61(2):287-307.
[4] Henson R A,Templin J L,Willse J T.Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log-linear models with latent variables[J].Psychometrika,2009,74(2):191.
[5] Haertel E H.Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items[J].Journal of Educational Measurement,26(4):301-321.
[6] Templin J L,Henson R.Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models[J].Psychological Methods,2006,11(3):287-305.
[7] Hartz S M.A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities:Blending theory with practicality[J].American Journal of Gastroenterology,2002,95(4):906-909.
[8] de la Torre J,Lee Y S.Evaluating the Wald test for item level comparison of saturated and reduced models in cognitive diagnosis[J].Journal of Educational Measurement,2013,50(4):355-373.
[9] Li Hiongli,Hunter C V,Lei Puiwa.The selection of cognitive diagnostic models for a reading comprehension test[EB/OL].
[2017-06-19].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281273001_The_selection_of_cognitive_diagnostic_models_for_a_reading_test.
[10] Rojas G,de la Torre J,Olea J.Choosing between general and specific cognitive diagnosis models when the sample size is small[C]∥In Annual Meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education,Vancouver,British Columbia,Canada,2012.
[11] Ma Wenchao,Iaconangelo C,de la Torre J.Model similarity,model selection,and attribute classification[J].Applied Psychological Measurement,2016,40(3):200-207.
[12] de la Torre J,van der Ark L A,Rossi G.Analysis of clinical data from a cognitive diagnosis modeling framework[J].Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,2017,9(3):210-213.
[13] Tu Dongbo,Gao Xuliang,Wang Daxun,et al.A new measurement of internet addiction using diagnostic classification models[J].Frontiers in Psychology,2017,8:1768.
[14] Kaplan M,de la Torre J,Barrada J R.New item selection methods for cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing[J].Applied Psychological Measurement,2015,39(3):167-188.
[15] 张龙,涂冬波.多级计分题项目功能差异常用检测方法及比较[J].江西师范大学大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(5):441-448.

相似文献/References:

[1]夏梦连,毛秀珍*,杨 睿.属性多级和项目多级评分的认知诊断模型[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2018,(02):134.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2018.02.03]
 XIA Menglian,MAO Xiuzhen*,YANG Rui.Cognitive Diagnosis Models Under Polytomous Attributes and Polytomous Item[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2018,(04):134.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2018.02.03]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-03-12
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(31660278,31760288),江西省教育厅高校人文社科(XL1508,XL1507)和江西省社会科学规划(17JY12)资助项目.
作者简介:涂冬波(1978-),男,江西南昌人,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事心理统计与测量的研究.E-mail:tudongbo@aligun.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-20