[1]洪清玉,康春花,曾平飞*.数学问题提出能力的类别特征:基于潜剖面的分析[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2022,(06):626-632.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2022.06.10]
　HONG Qingyu,KANG Chunhua,ZENG Pingfei*.The Category Characteristics of Mathematical Problem Posing Ability:Analysis Based on Submersible Profile[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2022,(06):626-632.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2022.06.10]
点击复制

数学问题提出能力的类别特征:基于潜剖面的分析()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
626-632
栏目:
心理与教育测量
出版日期:
2022-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Category Characteristics of Mathematical Problem Posing Ability:Analysis Based on Submersible Profile
文章编号:
1000-5862(2022)06-0626-07
作者:
洪清玉1; 2; 康春花1; 曾平飞3*
1.浙江师范大学心理学院,浙江 金华 321004; 2.厦门市蔡林学校,福建 厦门 361000; 3.浙江师范大学教师教育学院,浙江 金华 321004)
Author(s):
HONG Qingyu1; 2; KANG Chunhua1;  ZENG Pingfei3*
1.School of Psychology,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua Zhejiang 321004,China; 2.Xiamen Cailin School,Xiamen Fujian 361000,China; 3.College of Teacher Education,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua Zhejiang 321004,China)
关键词:
数学问题提出能力;  测评工具;  评分者一致性信度;  潜剖面分析;  类别特征
Keywords:
ability to propose mathematical problems;  evaluation index;  raters' consistency reliability;  submersible profile analysis;  class feature
分类号:
B 841
DOI:
10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2022.06.10
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在已有测评框架的基础上,建构了测评指标的评分标准,通过应用多元概化理论验证了评分标准的可信度,进一步将其应用于小学生数学问题提出能力的实践调查中,通过潜剖面分析考察了小学生数学问题提出能力的现状及类别特征.研究结果表明:1)小学生在数学问题提出能力测评指标的3个子维度上的协方差分量较大,这说明用问题3个特征的得分来确定学生的数学问题提出能力的水平结果比较一致; 2)测评工具全域总分的合成概化系数为0.990 4,相对误差比较小,这说明评分者一致性程度较高,评分标准设置合理; 3)潜剖面分析的拟合指数与分类验证结果表明,小学生数学问题提出能力可划分为差异明显的3类; 4)问题提出能力不同类型的小学生在数学成绩上的差异明显.
Abstract:
Aiming at multiple nested and complex data structures,the theory of multivariate generalization is used to roughly retain the original information of the data,and the graders' consistency reliability of the evaluation indexes of the students' mathematical problem solving ability is verified.In addition,the problem raising ability of primary school students is classified through latent profile analysis to verify whether there are differences in math scores among students with different problem raising ability levels.The results show that the covariance component of the three sub-dimensions of the evaluation index of the students' mathematical problem posing ability is large,which indicates that the results of determining the level of the students' mathematical problem posing ability by using the scores of the three characteristics of the problems are consistent.The synthetic generalization coefficient of the overall score of the evaluation tool in this study is 0.990 4,with a relatively small error,indicating a high degree of consistency among the raters in this test.The results of fitting index and classification verification show that it is reasonable to divide students' mathematical problem putting ability into three categories.Students with different problem-solving abilities have different performance in mathematics.

参考文献/References:

[1] 夏小刚,汪秉彝,吕传汉.中小学生提出数学问题能力的评价再探 [J].数学教育学报,2008,17(2):8-11.
[2] 谢先成.基于核心素养的《普通高中数学课程标准(2017年版)》解读:访数学课程标准修订组组长、东北师范大学原校长史宁中教授 [J].教师教育论坛,2018,31(6):6-9.
[3] STICKLES P R.An analysis of secondary and middle school teachers' mathematical problem posing [J].Investigations in Mathematics Learning,2011,3(2):1-34.
[4] OLSON J C,KNOTT L.When a problem is more than a teacher's question [J].Educational Studies in Mathematics,2013,83(1):27-36.
[5] SINGER F M,ELLERTON F N,CAI Jinfa.Mathematical problem posing problem-posing research in mathematics education:some answered and unanswered questions [M].New York:Springer,2015:4-8.
[6] 洪清玉,康春花,曾平飞,等.数学问题提出能力的测评模型及指标赋权 [J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(1):38-45.
[7] JONASSEN D H.Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes [J].Educational Technology Research and Development,1997,45(1):65-94.
[8] CONSTANTINOS C,NICHOLAS M,MARIOS P,et al.An empirical taxonomy of problem posing processes [J].ZDM:Mathematics Education,2005,37(3):149-158.
[9] SILVER E A.On mathematical problem posing [J].For the Learning of Mathematics,1994,14(1):19-28.
[10] ENGLISH L D.Children's problem posing within formal and informal contexts [J].Journal Research in Mathematics Education,1998,29(1):83-106.
[11] MAYER R E.Cognitive,metacognitive,and motivational aspects of problem solving [J].Instructional Science,1998,26(1):49-63.
[12] 宋广文,何文广,孔伟.问题表征、工作记忆对小学生数学问题解决的影响 [J].心理学报,2011,43(11):1283-1292.
[13] 连榕.认知心理学 [M].北京:高等教育出版社,2010:160-164.
[14] 呙亚慧.小学数学题中三类隐含数量关系提取 [D].武汉:华中师范大学,2017.
[15] 郑毓信.问题解决与数学教育 [M].南京:江苏教育出版社,1994:46-47.
[16] HASTIE R.Problems for judgment and decision making [J].Annual Review Psychology,2003,52(1):653-683.
[17] 蔡艳,陈抚良.多元概化理论在教育评估信度分析中的应用研究 [J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,31(3):306-310.
[18] 王孟成.毕向阳.潜变量建模与Mplus应用:进阶篇 [M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2018.
[19] 孙临美.小学生的数学问题提出与问题解决:以良构问题和劣构问题为视点 [J].教育测量与评价,2012(4):29-34.
[20] 杨志明.测评的概化理论及其应用 [M].北京:教育科学出版社,2003.
[21] 陈宇帅,温忠麟,顾红磊.因子混合模型:潜在类别分析与维度分析的整合 [J].心理科学,2015,23(3):529-538.
[22] 康文亮.数学问题提出能力的调查与研究 [D].呼和浩特:内蒙古师范大学,2013.
[23] 黄星烨.高中生非智力因素与数学问题提出能力的相关性研究 [D].南京:南京师范大学,2017.
[24] 任丹阳.五至八年级学生数学问题提出能力的现状调查 [D].上海:华东师范大学,2018.
[25] 杨琴.高师生元认知知识、元认知监控与数学问题提出的相关研究 [D].桂林:广西师范大学,2011.
[26] 陈景.初中生提出数学问题能力的研究 [D].济宁:曲阜师范大学,2014.
[27] 洪丽暖,郭玉峰.初中生数学问题提出能力的年级差异研究 [J].中国数学教育(初中版),2019(12):3-11.

相似文献/References:

[1]洪清玉,康春花*,曾平飞,等.数学问题提出能力的测评模型及指标赋权[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,(01):38.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2021.01.06]
　HONG Qingyu,KANG Chunhua*,ZENG Pingfei,et al.The Evaluation Model and Index Weighting of Ability to Propose Mathematical Problems[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2021,(06):38.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2021.01.06]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-12-17
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学青年基金(22YJA190005)资助项目.
通信作者:曾平飞(1963—),男,广西荔浦人,教授,博士,主要从事心理测量与评价方面的研究.E-mail:zpf@zjnu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-11-25