[1]张 玮,李显风*,何 瑶,等.基于江西省站点资料对智能网格实况分析产品的检验评估[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,(04):403-410.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2020.04.12]
 ZHANG Wei,LI Xianfeng*,HE Yao,et al.The Quality Assessment of the Intelligent Grid Real-Time Analysis Products Using the Station Data in Jiangxi Province[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2020,(04):403-410.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2020.04.12]
点击复制

基于江西省站点资料对智能网格实况分析产品的检验评估()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
403-410
栏目:
信息科学与技术
出版日期:
2020-08-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Quality Assessment of the Intelligent Grid Real-Time Analysis Products Using the Station Data in Jiangxi Province
文章编号:
1000-5862(2020)04-0403-08
作者:
张 玮1李显风1*何 瑶2邹海波3
1.江西省气象信息中心,江西 南昌 330096; 2.江西省大气探测技术中心,江西 南昌 330096; 3.江西省气象科学研究所,江西 南昌 330096
Author(s):
ZHANG Wei1LI Xianfeng1*HE Yao2ZHOU Haibo3
1.Jiangxi Meteorological Information Center,Nanchang Jiangxi 330096,China; 2.Jiangxi Atmosphere Observation Technology Center,Nanchang Jiangxi 330096,China; 3.Meteorological Sciences Institute of Jiangxi Province,Nanchang Jiangxi 330096,China
关键词:
智能网格实况产品 气象站资料 检验评估
Keywords:
intelligent grid real-time analysis product meteorological station data quality assessment
分类号:
P 415.1; P 409
DOI:
10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2020.04.12
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
利用江西省2019年3月~2020年2月气象站观测资料,在小时尺度上,对中国气象局下发的智能网格实况的2 m气温、湿度、风速、降水等多个气象要素产品进行检验评估.研究分析各类产品的数据误差及其时空变化规律,验证该产品在研究区的适用性.研究结果表明:2 m气温、相对湿度产品与站点观测较为一致,其相关系数均可达0.9以上,2 m气温均方根误差在1.0 ℃左右,准确率可达80%以上,相对湿度均方根误差小于10%,准确率可达90%以上.风速产品的数据精度较低,相比站点观测风速明显偏弱,70%站点的风向准确率小于50%,风向准确率仅为40%左右.降水产品能准确反映年内逐小时变化趋势,但存在一定程度低估,相关系数基本在0.8以上,平均误差为-0.1~0.1 mm·h-1,平均绝对误差小于0.2 mm·h-1.与站点观测相比,降水产品对强降水明显偏弱.地形对实况网格产品准确性有较大影响,产品误差在地形复杂山区中比在平原地区中明显偏大.总体上,2 m气温、相对湿度产品质量较高,基本可满足业务服务需求.风速产品及降水产品在大降水量级下的误差较大,与业务服务需求有一定差距.
Abstract:
In the paper,the quality of intelligent grid real-time analysis products that consist of the 2 m temperature,humidity,wind speed,precipitation issued by China Meteorological Administration is assessed by the meteorological station observation data from January 2019 to December 2019 in Jiangxi province.The data error of each products and its temporal and spatial variation characteristic were analyzed to verify the applicability of products in this study area.Results show that the 2 m temperature and relative humidity products have well consistency with the station observation data.The correlation coefficients are all above 0.9,the RMSE of the 2 m temperature is about 1.0 ℃,and the accuracy is above 80%.The RMSE of the relative humidity is less than 10%,and the accuracy is above 90%.The data accuracy of the wind speed product is a bit low.The wind speed is obviously weak compared with the site observation wind speed.70% of the station wind direction accuracy is less than 50%,while the wind direction accuracy is only about 40%.Precipitation products can accurately reflect the trend of hourly change in the year,but there is a certain underestimation.The correlation coefficient is mainly above 0.8,the average error is between -0.1 mm·h-1 and 0.1 mm·h-1,and the average absolute error is less than 0.1 mm·h-1.Compared with station observation,precipitation products are obviously weak at heavy rainfall.The terrain has a great influence on the accuracy of the real-time grid products.The product error is obviously larger in the complex terrain mountain area than in the plain area.On the whole,the quality of 2 m temperature and relative humidity products is high and basically can meet the application and service needs.Wind speed products and precipitation products at the large precipitation level have large errors,and there is a certain gap for the application and service needs.

参考文献/References:

[1] 金荣花,代刊,赵瑞霞,等.我国无缝隙精细化网格天气预报技术进展与挑战[J].气象,2019,45(4):445-457.
[2] 师春香,姜立鹏,张涛.CMA陆面数据同化业务系统及产品介绍[C].中国气象学会年会,2013.
[3] 韩帅,师春香,姜志伟,等.CMA高分辨率陆面数据同化系统(HRCLDAS-V1.0)研发及进展[J].气象科技进展,2018,8(1):102-108.
[4] 潘旸,谷军霞,徐宾,等.多源降水数据融合研究及应用进展[J].气象科技进展,2018,8(1):143-152.
[5] 师春香,潘旸,谷军霞,等.多源气象数据融合格点实况产品研制进展[J].气象学报,2019,77(4):774-783.
[6] 师春香,谷军霞,韩帅,等.全国智能网格实况融合分析产品进展[C].中国气象学会年会,2018.
[7] 符娇兰,宗志平,代刊,等.一种定量降水预报误差检验技术及其应用[J].气象,2014,40(7):796-805.
[8] 唐文苑,周庆亮,刘鑫华,等.国家级强对流天气分类预报检验分析[J].气象,2017,43(1):67-76.
[9] 宫宇,代刊,徐珺,等.GRAPES-GFS模式暴雨预报天气学检验特征[J].气象,2018,44(9):1148-1159.
[10] 江志红,卢尧,丁裕国.基于时空结构指标的中国融合降水资料质量评估[J].气象学报,2013,71(5):891-900.
[11] 沈艳,潘旸,宇婧婧,等.中国区域小时降水量融合产品的质量评估[J].大气科学学报,2013,36(1):37-46.
[12] 张蒙蒙,江志红.我国高分辨率降水融合资料的适用性评估[J].气候与环境研究,2013,18(4):461-471.
[13] 宇婧婧,沈艳,潘旸,等.中国区域逐日融合降水数据集与国际降水产品的对比评估[J].气象学报,2015,73(2):394-410.
[14] 李显风,周自江,李志鹏,等.基于江西省水文资料对中国融合降水产品的质量评估[J].气象,2017,43(12):1534-1546.
[15] 潘旸,沈艳,宇婧婧,等.基于贝叶斯融合方法的高分辨率地面-卫星-雷达三源降水融合试验[J].气象学报,2015,73(1):177-186.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-03-17
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41865003)资助项目.
作者简介:张 玮(1980-),男,江西会昌人,高级工程师,主要从事气象信息处理及分析应用.E-mail:5778360@qq.com
通信作者:李显风(1984-),男,江西抚州人,高级工程师,主要从事气象业务及资料分析处理.E-mail:lixianfeng223@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-08-10