[1]贾美玉,张金屯*,宋振辉,等.五台山不同海拔林线森林斑块内草本群落与表层土壤特征[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2022,(02):171-179.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2022.02.09]
　JIA Meiyu,ZHANG Jintun*,SONG Zhenhui,et al.The Understory Herbage Community and Surface Soil Characters at Different Altitudes of Treeline Forest Patch in Wutai Mountain[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2022,(02):171-179.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2022.02.09]
点击复制

五台山不同海拔林线森林斑块内草本群落与表层土壤特征()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2022年02期
页码:
171-179
栏目:
生命科学
出版日期:
2022-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Understory Herbage Community and Surface Soil Characters at Different Altitudes of Treeline Forest Patch in Wutai Mountain
文章编号:
1000-5862(2022)02-0171-09
作者:
贾美玉1; 张金屯2*; 宋振辉1; 梁 钰2; 张优倩1
1.东华理工大学水资源与环境工程学院,江西 南昌 330013; 2.北京师范大学生命科学学院,北京 10086
Author(s):
JIA Meiyu1; ZHANG Jintun2*; SONG Zhenhui1; LIANG Yu2; ZHANG Youqian1
1.School of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering,East China University of Technology,Nanchang Jiangxi 330013,China; 2.College of Life Science,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China
关键词:
海拔梯度;  林线森林;  林下草本;  物种多样性;  群落相似性;  土壤理化性质
Keywords:
altitude gradient;  treeline forest;  understory herbage;  species diversity;  community similarity;  soil physical and chemical properties
分类号:
S 718.54
DOI:
10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2022.02.09
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
该文选择五台山4个海拔梯度(2 200 m、2 250 m、2 300 m、2 350 m)的林线森林斑块为样地,对其林下的草本层和表层土壤(0～10 cm)进行野外调查取样和室内实验研究,运用指数、单因素方差分析、PERMANOVA分析、PCoA排序以及Pearson相关和Spearman秩相关进行分析.主要结果有:(i)在林线森林斑块内草本群落物种多样性在样地间差异不显著,但草本群落差异性显著受海拔梯度的影响.海拔2 350 m和2 300 m的2个样地群落物种组成相似性最小且群落相似性最小,海拔2 300～2 350 m引起了草本群落较大的变化.而海拔2 250 m和2 200 m的2个样地群落物种组成相似性最大,且群落相似性中等.推测海拔2 200～2 250 m的变化引起了物种地位的变化;(ii)单因素方差分析表明表层土壤pH值、全氮、全磷和全硫在不同海拔的林线森林斑块内呈显著变化,秩和检验结果表明有机碳在海拔梯度间变化不显著,全氮、全硫和有机碳的变化随海拔升高而增大;(iii)Pearson相关和Spearman秩相关的研究结果表明,土壤pH值与全氮、全硫、全磷和有机碳呈显著负相关,全氮、全硫、全磷和有机碳之间大多数呈显著正相关,这些土壤理化性质与植物多样性的相关性不显著.研究发现:在林线森林斑块内草本群落的海拔间变异受土壤理化性质的影响不显著,受海拔影响显著但变化趋势波动性较大,这可能与放牧和其他环境因子的影响有关,需设置更严格的控制实验来进一步分析.
Abstract:
The four altitudes(2 200 m,2 250 m,2 300 m,2 350 m)are selected as sites at treeline patch,the herbage and surface soil(0—10 cm)are investigated and indoor experiment is made.Indexes,one-way ANOVA,PERMANOVA,PCoA,and Pearson correlation and Spearman rank correlation coefficients are used for analysis.The results are as follows.(i)Species diversity has no significant difference between sites,but herbage community is significantly affected by altitude.Comparing herbage communities in site with 2 350 m and 2 300 m,it shows that they have both minimal of community component similarity and community similarity,it has experienced greatest community difference from 2 300 m to 2 350 m.While comparing two sites with 2 250 m and 2 200 m,community component similarity is greatest and medium of community similarity,it means that important values of species change more than community component from 2 200 m to 2 250 m.(ii)One-way ANOVA analysis shows that surface soil pH,total nitrogen,total phosphorus and total sulfur have significant difference between sites,Kruskal Wallis rank sum test shows that soil organic carbon have no significant difference between sites,and total nitrogen,total sulfur and organic carbon increase with altitude getting higher.(iii)Considering results from Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients,it shows that soil pH has negative correlation with total nitrogen,total phosphorus and total sulfur and organic carbon in surface soil,most of correlation between total nitrogen,total phosphorus, total sulfur and organic carbon are positive,these soil properties have no significant with species diversity.It is found that understory herbage community in treeline forest patch fluctuates and is affected with altitude,not soil properties,the reason may be from grazing and other environmental conditions,more strict experiment shall be set for deep research.

参考文献/References:

[1] HARSCH M A,HUMLME P E,MCGLONE M S,et al.Are treelines advancing?a global meta-analysis of treeline response to climate warming[J].Ecology Letters,2009,12(10):1040-1049.
[2] 方近圻,吴宁,罗鹏,等.干扰对高山林线再形成过程的影响[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(12):1493-1498.
[3] DAWES M A,HÄTTENSCHWILER S,BEBI P,et al.Species-specific tree growth responses to 9 years of CO2 enrichment at the alpine treeline[J].Journal of Ecology,2011,99(2):383-394.
[4] D'ARRIGO R,JACOBY G,BUCKLEY B,et al.Tree growth and inferred temperature variability at the North American Arctic treeline[J].Global and Planetary Change,2009,65(1/2):71-82.
[5] SPEED J D M,AUSTRHEIM G,HESTER A J,et al.Experimental evidence for herbivore limitation of the treeline[J].Ecology,2010,91(11):3414-3420.
[6] BHARTI R R,ADHIKARI B S,RAWAT G S.Assessing vegetation changes in timberline ecotone of Nanda Devi National Park,Uttarakhand[J].International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2012,18:472-479.
[7] HUGHES N M,JOHNSON D M,AKHALKATSI M,et al.Characterizing Betula litwinowii seedling microsites at the alpine-treeline ecotone,Central Greater Caucasus Mountains,Georgia[J].Arctic,Antarctic and Alpine Research,2009,41(1):112-118.
[8] ANSCHLAG K,BROLL G,HOLTMEIER F K.Mountain birch seedlings in the treeline ecotone,subarctic Finland:variation in above- and below-ground growth depending on microtopography[J].Arctic,Antarctic and Alpine Research,2008,40(4):609-616.
[9] PEREG D,PAYETTE S.Development of black spruce growth forms at treeline[J].Plant Ecology,1998,138(2):137-147.
[10] 牛莉芹,程占红.五台山森林群落中物种多样性对旅游干扰的生态响应[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(4):106-111.
[11] SPEED J D M,AUSTRHEIM G,HESTER A J,et al.Growth limitation of mountain birch caused by sheep browsing at the altitudinal treeline[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2011,261(7):1344-1352.
[12] GILLIAM F S.The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems[J].BioScience,2007,57(10):845-858.
[13] DULLINGER S,DIRNBÖCK T,GRABHERR G.Modelling climate change-driven treeline shifts:relative effects of temperature increase,dispersal and invasibility[J].Journal of Ecology,2004,92(2):241-252.
[14] BEAUREGARD F,DE BLOIS S.Rapid latitudinal range expansion at cold limits unlikely for temperate understory forest plants[J].Ecosphere,2016,7(11):e01549.
[15] 崔宁洁,陈小红,刘洋,等.不同林龄马尾松人工林林下灌木和草本多样性[J].生态学报,2014,34(15):4313-4323.
[16] 崔宁洁,张丹桔,刘洋,等.不同林龄马尾松人工林林下植物多样性与土壤理化性质[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(10):2610-2617.
[17] 吴彦,刘庆,何海,等.亚高山针叶林人工恢复过程中物种多样性变化[J].应用生态学报,200415(8):1301-1306.
[18] 潘红丽,李迈和,蔡小虎,等.海拔梯度上的植物生长与生理生态特性[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(2):722-730.
[19] 刘鸿雁,曹艳丽,田军,等.山西五台山高山林线的植被景观[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(2):263-269.
[20] RODRÍGUEZ-LLERENA V M,DAMIÁN-CARRIÓN D A,SANTILLÁN-LIMA P G,et al.Forest biodiversity in Andean brow and its relation to the carbon content in the above-ground biomass[J].Acta Agronómica,2017,66(1):35-41.
[21] 漆良华,彭镇华,张旭东,等.退化土地植被恢复群落物种多样性与生物量分配格局[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(11):1697-1702.
[22] LIU Hongyan,TANG Zhiyao,DAI Junhu,et al.Larch timberline and its development in North China[J].Mountain Research and Development,2002,22(4):359-367.
[23] NILSSON M C,WARDLE D A.Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver:evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest[J].Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2005,3(8):421-428.
[24] LOMOLINO M V.Elevation gradients of species-density:historical and prospective views[J].Global Ecology and Biogeography,2001,10(1):3-13.
[25] 崔本义,朱世忠,曳红玉.五台山植物资源[M].太原:山西科学技术出版社,2011:3-10.
[26] 刘秀丽,张勃,任媛,等.五台山地区草地生态系统服务价值估算[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(5):24-29.
[27] 张金屯.数量生态学[M].2版.北京:科学出版社,2011:1-500.
[28] HUDSON J M G,HENRY G H R.Increased plant biomass in a high arctic heath community from 1981 to 2008[J].Ecology,2009,90(10):2657-2663.
[29] ANDERSON M J.A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance[J].Austral Ecology,2001,26(1):32-46.
[30] 金慧,赵莹,赵伟,等.长白山牛皮杜鹃群落物种多样性的海拔梯度变化及相似性[J].生态学报,2015,35(1):125-133.
[31] 胡相明,程积民,万惠娥.黄土丘陵区人工林下草本层植物的结构特征[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(3):41-45.
[32] HOLTMEIER F K,BROLL G.Sensitivity and response of northern hemisphere altitudinal and polar treelines to environmental change at landscape and local scales[J].Global Ecology and Biogeography,2005,14(5):395-410.
[33] 葛晓改,黄志霖,程瑞梅,等.三峡库区马尾松人工林凋落物和根系输入对土壤理化性质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(12):3301-3308.
[34] 郭泉水,康义,赵玉娟,等.三峡库区消落带土壤氮磷钾、pH 值和有机质变化[J].林业科学,2012,48(3):7-10.
[35] 李志安,邹碧,丁永祯,等.植物残茬对土壤酸度的影响及其作用机理[J].生态学报,2005,25(9):2382-2388.
[36] 林毅,梁颁捷,朱其清.三明烟区土壤pH值与土壤有效养分的相关性[J].烟草科技,2003,36(6):35-37.
[37] 赵成章,石福习,董小刚,等.祁连山北坡退化林地植被群落的自然恢复过程及土壤特征变化[J].生态学报,2011,31(1):115-122.
[38] 杨小波,张桃林,吴庆书.海南琼北地区不同植被类型物种多样性与土壤肥力的关系[J].生态学报,2002,22(2):190-196.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-11-30
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(31170494),博士科研启动基金(DHBK2019103)和2022年江西省大学生创新创业训练计划(202210405025)资助项目.
作者简介:贾美玉(1988—),女,山西长治人,讲师,博士,主要从事植被多样性与格局分析研究.E-mail:meiyu.jia@163.com
通信作者:张金屯(1957—),男,山西运城人,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事数量生态学研究.E-mail:zhangjt@bnu.edu
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-03-25