[1]黄 玉,罗 芬,熊建华,等.多级评分多策略认知诊断方法[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,(04):376-381.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2019.04.08]
　HUANG Yu,LUO Fen,XIONG Jianhua,et al.The Multiple-Strategy Cognitive Diagnosis Method with Polytomous Scoring[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2019,(04):376-381.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2019.04.08]
点击复制

多级评分多策略认知诊断方法()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
376-381
栏目:
心理与教育测量
出版日期:
2019-08-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Multiple-Strategy Cognitive Diagnosis Method with Polytomous Scoring
文章编号:
1000-5862(2019)04-0376-06
作者:
黄 玉; 罗 芬; 熊建华; 丁树良; 甘登文*
江西师范大学计算机信息工程学院,江西 南昌 330022
Author(s):
HUANG Yu; LUO Fen; XIONG Jianhua; DING Shuliang; GAN Dengwen*
College of Computer Information Engineering,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang Jiangxi 330022,China
关键词:
认知诊断;  多级评分;  多策略认知诊断;  Q矩阵
Keywords:
cognitive diagnosis;  multiple-strategy cognitive diagnosis;  polytomous;  Q matrix
分类号:
B 841.7; TP 301.6
DOI:
10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2019.04.08
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
多级评分比2级评分能提供更全面更丰富的诊断信息,更好地反映被试对知识的掌握状况.考虑到存在不同认知诊断策略对应不同属性层级关系的情形,甚至在某种评分规则下,存在同一个项目使用不同策略,对应的满分值也不同的复杂情况,该文利用项目反应理论等值的做法,处理这种复杂情况.Monte Carlo模拟实验表明:对含有多策略的多级评分反应数据,这种处理方法有助于提高认知诊断模型分类的准确性.
Abstract:
Cognitive diagnosis(CD)is the product of the combination of modern psychometrics and cognitive psychology.Polytomous scoring items can provide more comprehensive information,and better reflect the KS of the examinees.Taking into account the existence of different cognitive strategies corresponding to different attribute hierarchies,even under some scoring rules,there is a complex situation in which the same item uses different problem-sovling strategies maybe corresponding to different values,borrowing the equivalent approach of project response theory to deal with this complex situation.Monte Carlo simulation experiments show that in the polytomous scoring test when the response data of examinees contained multiple-strategy responses:The diagnosis results using multiple-strategy CD method pattern match ration(PMR)better than the single-strategy CD method.The method,the PMR in various slip all higher than other methods,their method the score conversion caused the lossing of information.

参考文献/References:

[1] Rupp A A,Mislevy R J.Cognitive foundations of structured item response models[C].New York:Cambridge University Press,2007.
[2] 丁晓,吕娜,杨雅琳,等.工作记忆成分的年龄相关差异对算术策略运用的预测效应[J].心理学报,2017,49(6):759-770.
[3] Geary D C,Hoard M K,Byrd-Craven J,et al.Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability[J].Child Development,2007,78(4):1343-1359.
[4] Zhou Xinlin,Chen Chuansheng,Dong Qi,et al.Event-related potentials of single-digit addition,subtraction,and multiplication[J].Neuropsychologia,2006,44(12):2500-2507.
[5] de la Torre J,Douglas J.Model evaluation and multiple strategies in cognitive diagnosis:an analysis of fraction subtraction data[J].Psychometrika,2008,73(4):595-624.
[6] 涂冬波,蔡艳,戴海琦,等.一种多策略认知诊断方法:MSCD方法的开发[J].心理学报,2012,44(11):1547-1553.
[7] 孙佳楠,张淑梅,辛涛,等.基于Q矩阵和广义距离的认知诊断方法[J].心理学报,2011,43(9):1095-1102.
[8] 丁树良,祝玉芳,林海菁,等.Tatsuoka Q矩阵理论的修正[J].心理学报,2009,41(2):175-181.
[9] 刘铁川.Mix-DINA模型功能开发及其与DINA、MS-DINA模型的模拟与实证比较[D].南昌:江西师范大学,2012.
[10] 戴步云,张敏强,焦璨,等.基于CD-CAT的多策略RRUM模型及其选题方法开发[J].心理学报,2015,47(12):1511-1519.
[11] Hartz S M.A bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities:blendding theory with practicality[D].Urbana:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,2002.
[12] 祝玉芳,王黎华,丁树良,等.多策略的多级评分认知诊断方法的开发[J].江西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(4):371-376.
[13] Sun Jianan,Xin Tao,Zhang Shumei,et al.A polytomous extension of the generalized distance discriminating method[J].Applied Psychological Measurement,2013,37(7):503-521.
[14] 丁树良,罗芬,汪文义.多级评分认知诊断测验蓝图的设计:独立型和收敛型结构[J].江西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(3):265-269.
[15] 丁树良,汪文义,罗芬.多级评分认知诊断测验蓝图的设计:根树型结构[J].江西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(2):111-118.
[16] 田伟,辛涛.基于等级反应模型的规则空间方法[J].心理学报,2012,44(1):249-262.
[17] 丁树良,杨淑群,汪文义.可达矩阵在认知诊断测验编制中的重要作用[J].江西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010,34(5):490-494.
[18] 丁树良,汪文义,杨淑群.认知诊断测验蓝图的设计[J].心理科学,2011,34(2):258-265.
[19] Leighton J P,Gierl M J,Hunka S M.The attribute hierarchy method for cognitive assessment:avariation on Tatsuoka's rule-space approach[J].Journal of Educational Measurement,2004,41(3):205-237.
[20] Samejima F.Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores[J].Psychometrika,1970,35(1):139.
[21] 陈青,丁树良,朱隆尹,等.3参数等级反应模型及其参数估计[J].江西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010,34(2):117-122.
[22] Leighton J P,Gierl M J.Cognitive diagnostic as-sessment for education:theory and applications[J].Journal of Qingdao Technical College,2007,45(4):407-411.
[23] 丁树良,罗芬,汪文义,等.Q矩阵探微[J].江西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2017,50(1):71-79.

相似文献/References:

[1]李娟,丁树良,罗芬.基于等级反应模型的广义距离判别法[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2012,(06):636.
　HU Hai,GAN Deng-wen,WANG Wen-yi,et al.The Generalized Distance Discrimination Based on Graded Response Model[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2012,(04):636.
[2]丁树良,罗芬.由偏序关系的可达阵导出Hasse图的有效算法——兼谈其在认知诊断中的作用[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013,(05):441.
　DING Shu-liang,LUO Fen.An Efficient Algorithm of Deriving Hasse Diagram from the Reachibility Matrix of a Partial Order Relation——Together with Its Application to Cognitive Diagnosis[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2013,(04):441.
[3]丁树良,汪文义,罗芬.多级评分认知诊断测验蓝图的设计——根树型结构[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2014,(02):111.
　DING Shu-liang,WANG Wen-yi,LUO Fen.Design of Polytomous Cognitively Diagnostic Test Blueprint——For the Rooted Tree Type[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2014,(04):111.
[4]丁树良,罗芬,汪文义.多级评分认知诊断测验蓝图的设计——独立型和收敛型结构[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2014,(03):265.
　DING Shu-liang,LUO Fen,WANG Wen-yi.Design of Polytomous Cognitively Diagnostic Test Blueprint---For the Independent and the Rhombus Attribute Hierarchies[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2014,(04):265.
[5]艾国金,甘登文,丁树良,等.不定长认知诊断计算机化自适应测验终止规则研究[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2014,(05):441.
　AI Guo-jin,GAN Deng-wen,DING Shu-liang,et al.Research on Variable-Length Termination Rules for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Cognitive Diagnosis[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2014,(04):441.
[6]祝玉芳,王黎华,丁树良,等.多策略的多级评分认知诊断方法的开发[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,(04):371.
　ZHU Yufang,WANG Lihua,DING Shuliang,et al.The Development of Multiple-Strategies Cognitive Diagnosis with Polytomous Response[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2015,(04):371.
[7]艾国金,甘登文,丁树良.计算机化自适应诊断测验双重约束变长终止规则[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,(05):449.
　AI Guojin,GAN Dengwen,DING Shuliang.The Dual Restrictions Variable-Length Termination Rule in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2015,(04):449.
[8]祝玉芳.GDD-P在进位计数制中的应用[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,(05):453.
　ZHU Yufang.An Application of the GDD-P in Carrying Notation[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2015,(04):453.
[9]詹沛达,丁树良,王立君.多分属性层级结构下引入逻辑约束的理想掌握模式[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,(03):289.
　ZHAN Peida,DING Shuliang,WANG Lijun.The Ideal Mastery Pattern for Polytomous Attributes with Hierarchical Structure Incorporating Mastery Level Restriction[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2017,(04):289.
[10]李元白,曾平飞,杨亚坤,等.一种非参数的多策略方法:多策略的海明距离判别法[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2018,(01):67.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2018.01.12]
　LI Yuanbai,ZENG Pingfei,YANG Yakun,et al.The Formulation of Multiple-Strategies Hamming Distance Discrimination[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2018,(04):67.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2018.01.12]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-10-17
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(31500909,31360237,31300876)和教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(BYJC880060)资助项目.
通信作者:甘登文(1956-),男,江西奉新人,教授,主要从事智能教学软件和应用统计方面的研究.E-mail:gdw8120429@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-10