[1]舒斯亮,许琴琴.公平关切信息不对称下双渠道供应链决策与激励合同设计[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2022,(04):349-356.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2022.04.04]
 SHU Siliang,XU Qinqin.The Decision and Incentive Contract Designing of Dual-Channel Supply Chain Based on Information Asymmetry of Fairness Concerns[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2022,(04):349-356.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2022.04.04]
点击复制

公平关切信息不对称下双渠道供应链决策与激励合同设计()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2022年04期
页码:
349-356
栏目:
数学与应用数学
出版日期:
2022-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Decision and Incentive Contract Designing of Dual-Channel Supply Chain Based on Information Asymmetry of Fairness Concerns
文章编号:
1000-5862(2022)04-0349-08
作者:
舒斯亮许琴琴
江西科技师范大学商学院,江西 南昌 330038
Author(s):
SHU SiliangXU Qinqin
School of Business,Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University,Nanchang Jiangxi 330038,China
关键词:
公平关切 信息不对称 双渠道供应链 决策 激励合同
Keywords:
fairness concerns information asymmetry dual-channel supply chain decision incentive contract
分类号:
F 272.3
DOI:
10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2022.04.04
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于实体零售商公平关切行为,分析信息对称与信息不对称下双渠道供应链决策问题,并探讨如何设计激励合同促使实体零售商传递真实的公平关切信息.研究发现:信息不对称下实体零售商传递不真实公平关切信息对双渠道供应链决策会产生影响,且与信息对称情形相比,信息不对称下制造商利润会减少,而实体零售商效用在传递公平关切值高于真实值时会增加; 制造商设计的激励合同能促使实体零售商传递真实的公平关切信息,但合同能否达成受实体零售商真实公平关切值、消费者对渠道价格差异敏感性等因素的影响.
Abstract:
Based on fairness concerns of the physical retailer,the decision of dual-channel supply chain under the situation of information symmetry and information asymmetry is analyzed,and it is discussed how to design the incentive contract to promote the physical retailer to deliver the real information of fairness concerns.The results show that when the physical retailer gives false information about fairness concerns,the decision of dual-channel supply chain will be affected,and compared with the situation of information symmetry,the manufacturer's profit will decrease,the utility of the physical retailer will increase when the fairness concerns value transmitted is higher than the real value.The incentive contract designed by the manufacturer can enable the physical retailer to deliver the real information of fairness concerns,however,whether the contract can be reached is affected by the real value of fairness concerns,the sensitivity of consumer to channel price difference,and so on.

参考文献/References:

[1] 周建亨,赵瑞娟.考虑引入渠道竞争的双渠道信号传递策略[J].系统工程理论与实践,2018,38(2):414-428.
[2] 赵士南,徐海燕,侯晓丽.基于冲突分析图模型的双渠道供应链价格冲突研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(S1):609-616.
[3] KUMAR N,RUAN Ranran.On manufacturers complementing the traditional retail channel with a direct online channel[J].Quantity Market Economics,2006,4(3):289-323.
[4] HENDERSHOTT T,ZHANG Jie.A model of direct and intermediated sales[J].Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,2006,15(2):279-316.
[5] 郭金森,周永务.制造商生产规模不经济的双渠道供应链融资策略研究[J].商业研究,2018(5):142-151.
[6] 梁喜,魏承莉.政府双重补贴下双渠道供应链创新及协调策略研究[J].工业工程与管理,2020,25(3):1-12.
[7] ZHANG Fang,WANG Cong.Dynamic pricing strategy and coordination in a dual-channel supply chain considering service value[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling,2018,54(2):722-742.
[8] 霍良安,吴记记.商誉影响下的双渠道供应链竞争广告策略研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2020,56(3):1-10.
[9] 陈宾,安增军,许明星.考虑公平关切的双渠道供应链决策与协调[J].统计与决策,2016(8):38-42.
[10]唐飞,许茂增.基于公平偏好的双渠道闭环供应链定价决策[J].系统工程,2017,35(4):110-115.
[11] 邹清明,叶广宇.考虑公平关切的双向双渠道闭环供应链的定价决策[J].系统管理学报,2018,27(2):281-290.
[12] 周岩,胡劲松,刘京.考虑公平关切的双渠道绿色供应链决策分析[J].工业工程与管理,2020,25(1):9-19.
[13] LI Bo,HOU Pengwen,LI Qinghua.Cooperative advertising in a dual-channel supply chain with a fairness concern of the manufacturer[J].IMA Journal of Management Mathematics,2017,28(2):259-277.
[14] WEI Guangxing,LIN Qiang.Dual-channel supply chain coordination with new buy-back contract based on fairness preference theory[J].Information Technology Journal,2014,13(6):1094-1101.
[15] 邓明荣,卢秀娟.需求信息不对称下基于信号博弈的双渠道供应链研究[J].运筹与管理,2016,25(4):125-133.
[16] 周亚平,王先甲.成本信息不对称下双渠道供应链的合作策略[J].统计与决策,2016(10):42-45.
[17] 计国君,胡李妹,TAN K H,等.信息不对称下双渠道定价与质量信息披露研究[J].软科学,2017,31(11):117-122.
[18] 罗美玲,李刚,张文杰.双渠道供应链中双向搭便车研究[J].系统管理学报,2014,23(3):314-323,338.
[19] 浦徐进,诸葛瑞杰,范旺达.考虑横向和纵向公平的双渠道供应链均衡策略[J].系统工程学报,2014,29(4):527-536.
[20] 吴正祥.同行关切公平对双渠道供应链决策的影响研究[J].中央财经大学学报,2019(7):115-128.
[21] 杜少甫,杜婵.考虑公平关切的供应链契约与协调[J].管理科学学报,2010,13(11):41-48.
[22] FUDENBERG D,TIROLE J.Game theory[M].Cambridge:The MIT Press,1991:841-846.
[23] 张盼,熊中楷.制造商回收成本信息不对称下零售商激励合同设计[J].管理工程学报,2019,33(4):144-150.
[24] 杨浩雄,孙丽君,孙红霞,等.服务合作双渠道供应链中的价格和服务策略[J].管理评论,2017,29(5):183-191.

相似文献/References:

[1]舒斯亮.公平关切下考虑企业社会责任的2个零售商竞争研究[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,(04):361.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2019.04.06]
 SHU Siliang.The Competition of Two Retailers with Corporate Social Responsibility under Fairness Concerns[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2019,(04):361.[doi:10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2019.04.06]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-11-25
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(71961010)和江西省教育厅科学技术研究(GJJ180611)资助项目.
作者简介:舒斯亮(1981—),男,江西南昌人,副教授,博士,主要从事运营与供应链管理研究.E-mail:shusiliang0904@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-25