[1]曾剑锋,柳 键.主导模式与风险厌恶对绿色供应链决策的影响研究[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,(02):204-211.
 ZENG Jianfeng,LIU Jian.The Effect of Dominant Mode and Risk Aversion on Green Supply Chain Decision[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2017,(02):204-211.
点击复制

主导模式与风险厌恶对绿色供应链决策的影响研究()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
204-211
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Effect of Dominant Mode and Risk Aversion on Green Supply Chain Decision
作者:
曾剑锋柳 键
1.江西师范大学学报杂志社,江西 南昌 330022; 2.江西财经大学信息管理学院,江西 南昌 330032
Author(s):
ZENG JianfengLIU Jian
1.Journal of Periodical Office,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang Jiangxi 330022,China; 2.School of Information Management,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang Jiangxi 330032,China
关键词:
绿色供应链 风险厌恶 主导模式 Stackelberg博弈
Keywords:
green supply chain risk aversion dominant mode Stackelberg game
分类号:
F 224.32
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
利用主从博弈方法研究由一个制造商和一个风险厌恶零售商构成的绿色供应链,建立Stackelberg博弈模型,通过数理方法分析零售商的风险厌恶程度和主导模式对绿色供应链决策的影响,研究结果表明:随着零售商的风险厌恶程度增大,制造商趋向于产品绿色度水平和产品批发价格的提高,而零售商则趋向于产品销售价格的降低,同时,制造商的利润和绿色供应链系统的效益均增大,而零售商的效用却减小; 对于消费者、零售商以及具有低风险厌恶零售商的供应链而言,零售商主导的供应链模式优于制造商主导的供应链模式,而对于制造商和具有高风险厌恶零售商的供应链,制造商主导的供应链模式优于零售商主导的供应链模式.
Abstract:
The green supply chain with one manufacturer and one risk-averse retailer is studied by the lead-follow game and the Stackelberg game model is established.By the mathematical methods,the effects of retailer’s risk aversion and dominant mode on decision-making policies of green supply chain are analyzed.The results show that with the increasing of risk aversion,the manufacturer tends to advance green degree level and wholesale price of the product,but the retailer tends to reduce sale price of the green product,simultaneously,the profits of the manufacturer and the benefit of the supply chain system both are increase,while the utility of the retailer decrease; the retailer-dominated supply chain is better for the consumers,the retailer and the supply chain with low-risk-averse retailer than the manufacturer-dominated supply chain,on the contrary,the manufacturer-dominated supply chain is better for the manufacturer and the supply chain with high-risk-averse retailer than the retailer-dominated supply chain.

参考文献/References:

[1] Sarkis J.Greening the supply chain [M].Berlin:Springer,2006.
[2] Vachon S,Klassen R D.Environmental management and manufacturing perfor-mance:the role of collaboration in the supply chain [J].International Journal of Production Economics,2008,111(2):299-315.
[3] Delmas M,Montiel I.Greening the supply chain:when is customer pressure effective? [J].Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,2009,18(1):171-201.
[4] 王能民,汪应洛,杨彤.绿色供应链管理的研究进展及趋势 [J].管理工程学报,2007,21(2):118-122.
[5] Bose I,Pal R.Do green supply chain management initiatives impact stock prices of firms? [J].Decision Support Systems,2012,52(3):624-634.
[6] Nagurney A,Toyasaki F.Supply chain super networks and environmental criteria [J].Transportation Research Part D,2003,39(8):185-213.
[7] 张德海.绿色供应链的多代理人合作创新机制研究 [J].科技管理研究,2010,30(5):106-108.
[8] 王怡,罗杰,孙裔德,等.绿色供应链企业间知识共享战略联盟动态博弈研究:帕累托有效协同视角 [J].工业技术经济,2013,3(3):61-66.
[9] 徐伟,郑燕飞.绿色供应链管理中有举报行为的政企博弈分析 [J].中国管理科学,2008,16(12):450-454.
[10] 朱庆华,窦一杰.基于政府补贴分析的绿色供应链管理博弈模型 [J].管理科学学报,2011,14(6):86-95.
[11] 金常飞.政府监管策略与供应链生产商绿色行为博弈研究 [J].世界科技研究与发展,2011,33(5):920-922.
[12] Li Zugang,Anderso T D,Cruz J M.Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains [J].European Journal of Operational Research,2012,218(3):602-613.
[13] 王玉燕,申亮.潜在绿色产品制造商进入市场的生产策略研究 [J].运筹与管理,2012,21(5):242-246.
[14] 曹海英,温孝卿.零售商主导型绿色供应链企业间的合作博弈分析 [J].统计与决策,2012(7):186-188.
[15] 邱国斌.基于损失厌恶的绿色供应链博弈研究 [J].当代经济管理,2013,35(12):18-23.
[16] Zhu Qinghua,Dou Yijie.Evolutionary game model between governments and core enterprises in green supply chains [J].Systems Engineering Theory and Practice,2007,27(12):85-89.
[17] 王世磊,严广乐.绿色供应链中供应商与核心企业的演化博弈模型分析 [J].科技与管理,2009,11(3):59-62.
[18] Swami S,Shah J.Channel coordination in green supply chain management:The case of package size and shelf-space allocation [J].Technology and Operations Management,2011,2(1):50-59.
[19] 曹柬,吴晓波,周根贵.基于产品效用异质性的绿色供应链协调策略 [J].计算机集成制造系统,2011,17(6):1279-1287.
[20] Barari S,Agarwal G,Zhang W J,et al.A decision framework for the analysis of green supply chain contracts:an evolutionary game approach [J].Expert Systems with Applications,2012,39(3):2965-2976.
[21] 桑圣举.绿色供应链的收益共享契约机制研究 [J].北京邮电大学学报:社会科学版,2013,15(2):95-100.
[22] Zhang Chengtang,Liu Liping.Research on coordination mechanism in three-level green supply chain under non-cooperative game [J].Applied Mathematical Modeling,2013,37(5):3369-3379.
[23] Swami S,Shah J.Channel coordination in green supply chain management [J].Journal of the Operational Research Society,2013,64(3):336-351.
[24] 李瑞海,张涛.减量化生产模式下绿色供应链效率比较 [J].系统管理学报,2009,18(4):432-435.
[25] Ghosh D,Shah J.A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures [J].Interational Journal of Production Economics,2012,135(2):568-583.
[26] Banker R D,Khosla I,Sinha K K.Quality and competition [J].Management Science,1998,44(9):1179-1192.
[27] 曹柬,吴晓波,周根贵.不对称信息下绿色采购激励机制设计 [J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(1):106-116.
[28] Xiao Tiaojun,Yang Danqin.Price and service competition of supply chains with risk-averse retailers under demand uncertainty [J].Interational Journal of Production Economics,2008,114(1):187-200.
[29] 林志炳,蔡晨,许保光.风险厌恶下的供应链定价策略分析 [J].运筹与管理,2008,17(4):29-33,38.
[30] Choi S C.Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer [J].Marketing Science,1991,10(4):271-279.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-10-25基金项目:国家自然科学基金(71261006,71461009)和江西省自然科学基金(20151BAB207061)资助项目.作者简介:曾剑锋(1977-),男,江西南康人,讲师,博士,主要从事运营与供应链管理、博弈论等方面的研究.E-mail:jf_zeng@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01